IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Bellomo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Seacoast Spartans EHL 45 12 10 22 0.489 0.0715 0.0735 0.2397 0.2464
2024-25 Seacoast Spartans NCDC 57 14 19 33 0.579 0.1338 0.1289 0.4681 0.4508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 25 8 9 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2025-26 · Castleton
+644.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19797
Forward overall
#1051
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Hopfner
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Walker Hamilton
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Doden
Augsburg · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.