IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Harder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-09-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 50 5 10 15 0.300 0.0769 0.0811 0.2261 0.2384
2005-06 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 41 12 15 27 0.658 0.1687 0.1699 0.4964 0.5000
2006-07 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 48 23 26 49 1.021 0.2615 0.2496 0.7695 0.7344
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 3 2 0 2 0.667
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 16 4 3 7 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2007-08 · St. Norbert
+134.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24616
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 1986
#356
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Bombardier
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Hartman
Hobart · 2021-22
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.