← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Ramaekers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1295 0.3422 0.3613
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0826 0.2281 0.2306
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 12 12 24 0.471 0.1153 0.1110 0.3221 0.3102
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 10 11 21 0.412 0.1009 0.0922 0.2819 0.2577
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC GR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 4 2 6 0.231
2019-20 Brockport D1 FR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 16 0 4 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Brockport
+192.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40198
Forward overall
#2098
Forward born in 1998
#2599
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2006-07
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.