IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Norby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 50 20 23 43 0.860 0.3026 0.2995 0.4217 0.4174
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 46 16 20 36 0.783 0.2754 0.2588 0.3837 0.3605
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2019-20 Brockport D1 — FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2019-20 · Brockport
-15.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19765
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 1998
#431
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Danilchev
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Ciavarella
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Papa
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.