IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Ihnacak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 6 13 19 0.396 0.1189 0.1277 0.2709 0.2908
2002-03 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 46 40 46 86 1.870 0.5616 0.5797 1.2797 1.3209
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Brown D1 ECAC SR 27 3 11 14 0.518
2005-06 Brown D1 ECAC JR 15 3 6 9 0.600
2004-05 Brown D1 ECAC SO 30 12 11 23 0.767
2003-04 Brown D1 ECAC FR 31 10 20 30 0.968
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2003-04 · Brown
+183.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9870
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 1985
#205
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Petriello
Buffalo State · 2004-05
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.