IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Colman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0347 0.0344 0.1213 0.1202
2019-20 — NCDC 49 5 24 29 0.592 0.1368 0.1368 0.4785 0.4785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC — 25 2 8 10 0.400
2020-21 Stevenson D1 — FR 15 6 8 14 0.933
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC — 15 6 8 14 0.933
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2020-21 · Stevenson
+2771.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5171
Defenseman overall
#1199
Defenseman born in 1999
#769
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Bassile
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Keck
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theodore Austin
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.