IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Bassile Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.0842 0.0850 0.2471 0.2494
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2017-18 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2016-17 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#52484
Forward overall
#2496
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jericho Petkovich
Trinity · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Staehely
St. Mary's · 2005-06
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Eftimovski
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.