IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Eftimovski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 55 3 10 13 0.236 0.0513 0.0513 0.1830 0.1830
2020-21 Pickering Panthers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 7 21 28 0.560 0.1373 0.1338 0.3833 0.3735
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 8 24 32 0.604 0.1480 0.1367 0.4133 0.3816
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 27 0 8 8 0.296
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 22 1 9 10 0.455
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 9 1 3 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+247.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10310
Defenseman overall
#2192
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ciampichini
Elmira · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Mather
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Czarnecki
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.