IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jericho Petkovich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 37 15 8 23 0.622 0.1437 0.1423 0.5026 0.4976
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 39 16 17 33 0.846 0.1956 0.1956 0.6842 0.6842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7909
Forward overall
#339
Forward born in 1999
#149
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Killian Hammersmith
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Cann
Elmira · 2003-04
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.