← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daylan Marchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Canmore Eagles AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Canmore Eagles AJHL 44 2 6 8 0.182 0.0610 0.0656 0.1682 0.1810
2016-17 Canmore Eagles AJHL 31 6 4 10 0.323 0.1082 0.1111 0.2985 0.3066
2017-18 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 50 14 16 30 0.600 0.1537 0.1527 0.4523 0.4495
2018-19 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 57 21 31 52 0.912 0.2337 0.2202 0.6877 0.6480
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D1 NCHA FR 15 2 1 3 0.200
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA 15 2 1 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2019-20 · Marian
+20.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27054
Forward overall
#1318
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.