IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Bedford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 48 21 25 46 0.958 0.2349 0.2349 0.6598 0.6598
2003-04 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 27 32 59 1.204 0.2951 0.2951 0.8290 0.8290
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 6 6 12 0.414
2006-07 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 23 7 5 12 0.522
2005-06 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 1 5 6 0.222
2004-05 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 18 4 5 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2004-05 · Elmira
+115.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13513
Forward overall
#370
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2013-14
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Payne
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.