IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike McKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 47 19 17 36 0.766 0.2301 0.2496 0.5243 0.5688
2003-04 — OJHL 18 4 6 10 0.556 0.1669 0.1735 0.3803 0.3954
2004-05 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 45 23 26 49 1.089 0.3271 0.3236 0.7454 0.7374
2005-06 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 39 38 77 1.925 0.5783 0.5508 1.3177 1.2551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 41 14 21 35 0.854
2008-09 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 38 16 18 34 0.895
2007-08 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 34 7 13 20 0.588
2006-07 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 31 12 13 25 0.806
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2006-07 · St. Lawrence
+104.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8576
Forward overall
#301
Forward born in 1986
#142
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Redick
Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.