← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Tracy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 25 2 13 15 0.600 0.1288 0.1292 0.2938 0.2948
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 41 5 14 19 0.463 0.0994 0.0994 0.2269 0.2269
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast GR 21 2 9 11 0.524
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 23 1 5 6 0.261
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 18 0 10 10 0.556
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 7 0 2 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2020-21 · Plymouth State
+134.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10776
Defenseman overall
#1639
Defenseman born in 1999
#948
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.