IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Whiteley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Langley Rivermen BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Langley Rivermen BCHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0482 0.0492 0.1819 0.1858
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 47 7 23 30 0.638 0.2459 0.2395 0.9289 0.9049
2013-14 — BCHL 55 2 14 16 0.291 0.1121 0.1040 0.4233 0.3928
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC — 26 5 14 19 0.731
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC — 26 3 14 17 0.654
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 4 8 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2014-15 · Marian
+209.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9698
Defenseman overall
#1218
Defenseman born in 1993
#1953
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Kostecki
Concordia · 2011-12
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Cavalieri
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Miller
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.