← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Shankar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Timmins Rock NOJHL 46 21 22 43 0.935 0.1561 0.1666 0.3892 0.4154
2017-18 CCHL 46 6 12 18 0.391 0.0849 0.0858 0.3027 0.3059
2018-19 CCHL 60 16 17 33 0.550 0.1193 0.1152 0.4255 0.4110
2019-20 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 15 30 45 0.818 0.1775 0.1775 0.6330 0.6330
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE 22 5 5 10 0.455
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE 19 5 8 13 0.684
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC 24 6 1 7 0.292
2021-22 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 24 6 1 7 0.292
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC 10 0 2 2 0.200
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D1 NCHA FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2020-21 · Concordia
+126.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27951
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2024-25
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.