← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Doll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-19 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lakeville North USHS-MN 21 12 11 23 1.095 0.1349 0.1349 0.2660 0.2660
2021-22 Lakeville North USHS-MN 28 22 23 45 1.607 0.1980 0.1980 0.3904 0.3904
2022-23 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 3 12 15 0.273 0.0969 0.1054 0.2863 0.3114
2023-24 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 10 16 26 0.456 0.1620 0.1685 0.4789 0.4981
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 52 13 20 33 0.635 0.2254 0.2226 0.6663 0.6580
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
+272.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28678
Forward overall
#1677
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.