IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

August Bouveng Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-08 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 35 10 18 28 0.800 0.0902 0.0869 0.2716 0.2616
2019-20 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.0656 0.0656 0.1974 0.1974
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 19 0 7 7 0.368
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 10 1 5 6 0.600
2020-21 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC FR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 4 1 0 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2020-21 · Anna Maria
+236.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25136
Forward overall
#1275
Forward born in 1999
#1820
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Sullivan
Colby · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Clark
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Sonedecker
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.