IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Lovett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Roxbury Latin NE-Prep 23 2 2 4 0.174 0.0334 0.0334 0.0792 0.0792
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 34 7 11 18 0.529 0.0775 0.0775 0.2593 0.2593
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2021-22 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 20 3 3 6 0.300
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40643
Forward overall
#2212
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Butcher
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Forsyth
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
James Carney
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.