IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Tibbs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 10 15 25 0.568 0.0743 0.0738 0.1928 0.1915
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 22 34 56 1.273 0.1665 0.1665 0.4320 0.4320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 23 1 2 3 0.130
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 10 1 2 3 0.300
2020-21 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14043
Forward overall
#650
Forward born in 1999
#771
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Caldwell
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Samson Mouland
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Carrick
Trinity · 2015-16
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.