IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Carrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Brockville Braves CCHL 45 3 8 11 0.244 0.0530 0.0547 0.1890 0.1952
2015-16 — NAHL 21 0 4 4 0.191 0.0677 0.0679 0.2009 0.2016
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 20 19 39 0.867 0.2433 0.2360 0.7128 0.6915
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D1 NESCAC JR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 Trinity D1 NESCAC SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 19 2 2 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2017-18 · Trinity
+45.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33195
Forward overall
#1418
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.