← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kieran Furlonger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 40 2 12 14 0.350 0.1154 0.1195 0.1191 0.1233
2018-19 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 44 4 11 15 0.341 0.1124 0.1104 0.1160 0.1140
2019-20 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 43 3 15 18 0.419 0.1380 0.1380 0.1424 0.1424
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 15 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 21 2 2 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2021-22 · Fredonia
+76.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13485
Defenseman overall
#2365
Defenseman born in 1999
#3938
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.