IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Bradley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 26 0 7 7 0.269 0.0519 0.0519 0.1232 0.1232
2021-22 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 33 2 4 6 0.182 0.0351 0.0351 0.0832 0.0832
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 14 1 3 4 0.286 0.0660 0.0661 0.2310 0.2312
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 57 10 13 23 0.404 0.1433 0.1361 0.4236 0.4022
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE — 16 2 1 3 0.188
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39404
Forward overall
#2463
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Watchorn
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Preston Hazelton
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Rimbach
St. Olaf · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.