IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Larsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-30 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 40 3 6 9 0.225 0.0520 0.0510 0.1819 0.1784
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 32 6 11 17 0.531 0.1228 0.1228 0.4295 0.4295
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 24 10 20 30 1.250
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 24 17 16 33 1.375
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 11 15 26 1.040
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13318
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Sankey
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Stefan
Utica · 2012-13
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.