IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-01-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 5 17 22 0.407 0.1163 0.1194 0.3154 0.3237
2001-02 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 49 12 37 49 1.000 0.2854 0.2796 0.7741 0.7585
2002-03 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 28 7 19 26 0.929 0.2650 0.2475 0.7188 0.6713
2003-04 Milton Menace OJHL 36 6 11 17 0.472 0.1319 0.1154 0.3259 0.2850
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Western New England D3 — SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Western New England D3 — JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Western New England D3 — SO 19 0 0 0 0.000
2003-04 Western New England D3 — FR 25 0 2 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2003-04 · Western New England
-67.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3743
Defenseman overall
#665
Defenseman born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Patterson
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Gwatkin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Bradbury
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.