IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Patterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 15 1 0 1 0.067 0.0224 0.0225 0.0617 0.0620
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 48 11 19 30 0.625 0.2296 0.2205 0.6597 0.6336
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 22 32 54 0.947 0.3481 0.3172 1.0000 0.9113
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2008-09 · St. Norbert
+25.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20444
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dill
Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devon Savignac
Concordia · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.