IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Lindblom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pine City Area USHS-MN 25 10 10 20 0.800 0.1013 0.1064 0.1943 0.2041
2017-18 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 41 3 10 13 0.317 0.0415 0.0425 0.1076 0.1102
2018-19 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 44 12 9 21 0.477 0.0624 0.0606 0.1620 0.1573
2019-20 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 40 11 24 35 0.875 0.1144 0.1144 0.2970 0.2970
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27612
Forward overall
#1435
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Linker
Becker · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric McLintock
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Avery Smith
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.