IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Artyom Mateychenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-06 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 32 6 15 21 0.656 0.2163 0.2218 0.2232 0.2288
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 27 2 13 15 0.556 0.1955 0.1955 0.2724 0.2724
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 35 10 31 41 1.171 0.4122 0.4122 0.5743 0.5743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 27 7 19 26 0.963
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 25 5 24 29 1.160
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 24 4 18 22 0.917
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 24 4 18 22 0.917
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2021-22 · Manhattanville
+382.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15826
Forward overall
#671
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Joslin
Babson · 2018-19
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bourque
Amherst · 2019-20
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Kwak
Roger Williams · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.