IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Lightfoot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0563 0.1915 0.1990
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 30 4 11 15 0.500 0.1085 0.1085 0.3830 0.3830
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 42 8 30 38 0.905 0.3689 0.3689 0.7240 0.7240
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 25 5 7 12 0.480
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 21 2 8 10 0.476
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2021-22 · Stevenson
+697.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8890
Forward overall
#386
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Lindgren
Lawrence · 2009-10
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Craner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Hogan
Utica · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.