IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Heath Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Middlesex NE-Prep 24 6 11 17 0.708 0.1403 0.1403 0.3227 0.3227
2019-20 Middlesex NE-Prep 24 15 12 27 1.125 0.2229 0.2229 0.5126 0.5126
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Stonehill D1 AHA SR 21 2 4 6 0.286
2023-24 Stonehill D1 AHA JR 35 1 7 8 0.229
2022-23 Stonehill D1 NE10 SO 25 4 13 17 0.680
2021-22 Stonehill D2 NE10 FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2021-22 · Stonehill
+121.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18728
Forward overall
#997
Forward born in 2002
#155
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Esposito
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2016-17
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.