← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Lefkof Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 43 2 20 22 0.512 0.1182 0.1232 0.2503 0.2609
2019-20 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 47 8 38 46 0.979 0.1247 0.1247 0.3096 0.3096
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 36 4 36 40 1.111 0.1416 0.1416 0.3514 0.3514
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 20 0 2 2 0.100
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 17 0 5 5 0.294
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 23 2 6 8 0.348
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 23 0 8 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2021-22 · New England College
+199.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5378
Defenseman overall
#1139
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.