IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kodi Legassie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hebron NE-Prep 25 13 2 15 0.600 0.1210 0.1210 0.2746 0.2746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 25 7 4 11 0.440
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 23 7 3 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Johnson & Wales
+319.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33326
Forward overall
#1332
Forward born in 2000
#485
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2012-13
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sitzman
Anna Maria · 2016-17
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.