IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Lehmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 6 23 29 0.617 0.0774 0.0789 0.1948 0.1987
2019-20 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 7 28 35 0.745 0.0935 0.0935 0.2351 0.2351
2020-21 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 40 5 11 16 0.400 0.0502 0.0502 0.1263 0.1263
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 0 9 9 0.360
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13136
Defenseman overall
#2242
Defenseman born in 2000
#2138
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicky Cozzi
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Greene
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Hofelich
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.