IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicky Cozzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 43 25 38 63 1.465 0.4829 0.4953 0.4984 0.5112
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 49 7 25 32 0.653 0.3642 0.3642 0.5281 0.5281
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8219
Forward overall
#334
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.57 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Norris
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2019-20
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Moher
Amherst · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Meeh
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.