IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicky Cozzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 43 25 38 63 1.465 0.1916 0.1965 0.4973 0.5101
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 49 7 25 32 0.653 0.2663 0.2663 0.5250 0.5250
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7846
Forward overall
#333
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Ruszkowski
Western New England · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Roethke
Concordia · 2022-23
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Moher
Amherst · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.