IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam McGill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Elite 35 12 8 20 0.571 0.0527 0.0521 0.1309 0.1295
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 40 3 9 12 0.300 0.0392 0.0392 0.1018 0.1018
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 34 10 11 21 0.618 0.0808 0.0808 0.2096 0.2096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37380
Forward overall
#1993
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alyandro De Leon
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Timur Gavrilovich
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Bullock
Canton · 2021-22
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.