← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timur Gavrilovich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-28 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 DME Hockey Academy USPHL-Premier 31 3 7 10 0.323 0.0364 0.0377 0.1097 0.1136
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 31 0 5 5 0.161 0.0373 0.0369 0.1304 0.1289
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0374 0.0374 0.1106 0.1106
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 17 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16603
Defenseman overall
#2688
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2016-17
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.