← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Benitez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 40 7 5 12 0.300 0.0439 0.0463 0.1469 0.1549
2016-17 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 47 11 12 23 0.489 0.0716 0.0723 0.2397 0.2420
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 33 5 8 13 0.394 0.0910 0.0862 0.3174 0.3005
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 16 2 4 6 0.375
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 16 2 4 6 0.375
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 28 6 9 15 0.536
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 28 6 9 15 0.536
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC FR 19 4 1 5 0.263
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 19 4 1 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2018-19 · Stevenson
+281.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30849
Forward overall
#1424
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.