← New Search ↗ Social Card

Félix Brassard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 19 20 39 0.672 0.1458 0.1346 0.5202 0.4801
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Norwich D1 LittleEast SR 8 2 6 8 1.000
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 2 6 8 1.000
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 28 18 13 31 1.107
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 28 18 13 31 1.107
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast SO 31 11 18 29 0.935
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 31 11 18 29 0.935
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 27 7 5 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2017-18 · Norwich
+285.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26215
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 1996
#545
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.