← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Prestia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.0965 0.0932 0.2200 0.2125
2018-19 OJHL 31 5 10 15 0.484 0.1454 0.1333 0.3312 0.3037
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 SO 3 1 2 3 1.000
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 3 1 2 3 1.000
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 FR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 25 3 7 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+261.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15421
Defenseman overall
#2370
Defenseman born in 1998
#3673
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.