IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Johansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New England Wolves EHL 17 4 8 12 0.706 0.2484 0.2577 0.3461 0.3590
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 41 5 18 23 0.561 0.1974 0.1974 0.2751 0.2751
2020-21 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 8 23 31 0.816 0.2871 0.2871 0.4000 0.4000
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 27 7 16 23 0.852
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 27 2 6 8 0.296
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 26 1 3 4 0.154
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4371
Defenseman overall
#948
Defenseman born in 2000
#494
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Burden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Grigori Gotovets
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2013-14
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.