← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Fisher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0654 0.0720 0.1697 0.1868
2018-19 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 11 2 5 7 0.636 0.0832 0.0872 0.2160 0.2263
2019-20 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 43 57 47 104 2.419 0.3164 0.3164 0.8209 0.8209
2020-21 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 43 29 39 68 1.581 0.2068 0.2068 0.5367 0.5367
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Castleton D3 LittleEast 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4989
Forward overall
#206
Forward born in 2000
#93
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2002-03
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.