IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Frost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0927 0.2295 0.2604
2019-20 — OJHL 42 3 3 6 0.143 0.0350 0.0350 0.0984 0.0984
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 47 14 31 45 0.957 0.2347 0.2206 0.6592 0.6195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 27 11 13 24 0.889
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 26 6 10 16 0.615
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 26 6 10 16 0.615
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 28 7 18 25 0.893
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2022-23 · Nazareth
+515.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30497
Forward overall
#1612
Forward born in 2001
#1613
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Kerchoff
Concordia · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Crone
Concordia · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Carter
Utica · 2013-14
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.