← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Milton Academy NE-Prep 29 1 1 2 0.069 0.0139 0.0139 0.0316 0.0316
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0112 0.0112 0.0284 0.0284
2021-22 Milton Academy NE-Prep 20 8 14 22 1.100 0.2218 0.2218 0.5035 0.5035
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 22 2 15 17 0.773
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 24 6 20 26 1.083
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 22 0 13 13 0.591
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 22 7 10 17 0.773
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2022-23 · Wesleyan
+551.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36405
Forward overall
#1676
Forward born in 2002
#607
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.