IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Driscoll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pingree NE-Prep 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0434 0.0434 0.0704 0.0704
2019-20 Pingree NE-Prep 29 11 12 23 0.793 0.2237 0.2237 0.3629 0.3629
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — NCDC 37 2 11 13 0.351 0.1959 0.1974 0.2841 0.2863
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 9 9 18 0.667
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 26 6 8 14 0.538
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 27 6 10 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2022-23 · Babson
+232.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33142
Forward overall
#1981
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Bromberg
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Livio Azevedo
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.