IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Fennell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 7 21 28 1.037 0.2091 0.2091 0.4746 0.4746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 25 6 18 24 0.960
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 12 3 3 6 0.500
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 19 7 5 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2022-23 · Tufts
+252.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19063
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 2002
#113
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Shell
Hobart · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Balson
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.