| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Peterborough Liftlock Stars | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2860 | 0.6885 | 0.8033 |
| 2007-08 | Peterborough Liftlock Stars | OJHL | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 | 0.0272 | 0.0305 | 0.0765 | 0.0858 |
| 2008-09 | Peterborough Liftlock Stars | OJHL | 45 | 23 | 21 | 44 | 0.978 | 0.2397 | 0.2565 | 0.6732 | 0.7205 |
| 2009-10 | Peterborough Liftlock Stars | OJHL | 50 | 14 | 28 | 42 | 0.840 | 0.2059 | 0.2096 | 0.5783 | 0.5886 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Buffalo State | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 12 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.333 |
| 2012-13 | Buffalo State | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 26 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.385 |
| 2011-12 | Buffalo State | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.389 |
| 2010-11 | Buffalo State | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 25 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.560 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.