← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Tenezaca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 38 2 7 9 0.237 0.0285 0.0285 0.0748 0.0748
2021-22 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 47 21 22 43 0.915 0.1102 0.1044 0.2890 0.2737
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 1 0 1 1 1.000
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 5 3 8 0.308
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Concordia
+244.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44292
Forward overall
#2075
Forward born in 2001
#1874
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.