← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pearce Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 47 0 6 6 0.128 0.0357 0.0357 0.0881 0.0881
2020-21 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 OJHL 52 4 12 16 0.308 0.0860 0.0777 0.2123 0.1918
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 28 2 20 22 0.786
2024-25 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 25 3 12 15 0.600
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Anna Maria
+298.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18120
Defenseman overall
#2304
Defenseman born in 2001
#4815
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2016-17
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2007-08
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.