IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Carmody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0263 0.0263 0.0624 0.0624
2019-20 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 23 6 8 14 0.609 0.1174 0.1174 0.2785 0.2785
2021-22 — NCDC 49 11 24 35 0.714 0.1651 0.1651 0.5776 0.5776
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 21 5 1 6 0.286
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 24 6 6 12 0.500
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 20 3 4 7 0.350
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 19 1 4 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Amherst
+91.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4556
Defenseman overall
#1192
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Stevens
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Serba
Norwich · 2000-01
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.