IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike DiMascolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 12 6 3 9 0.750 0.1733 0.1733 0.3670 0.3670
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 46 20 12 32 0.696 0.1607 0.1538 0.3404 0.3259
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 7 3 10 0.400
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 19 2 2 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Connecticut College
+59.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21373
Forward overall
#1049
Forward born in 2001
#483
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cullen Hennessy
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Hamming
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.