IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Popowcer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pomfret NE-Prep 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0193 0.0193 0.0458 0.0458
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 24 2 7 9 0.375 0.0549 0.0549 0.1839 0.1839
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 2 32 34 0.756 0.1105 0.1100 0.3705 0.3687
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 26 3 6 9 0.346
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 17 1 3 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Manhattanville
+238.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8853
Defenseman overall
#1782
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Berenguer
Hamline · 2005-06
0.944 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
George Curry
Canton · 2011-12
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Daniels
Hobart · 2021-22
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.